According to recently released documents, DHS considers Anti-Flock activists to be a national Security threat.
Government spy hubs across America are surveilling activists seeking to remove Flock surveillance cameras from their cities and towns according to documents obtained by Deeper States. These intelligence products show dozens of state fusion centers and their counterparts in the FBI and DHS circulating memos warning that peaceful protesters organizing to stop AI powered surveillance cameras in their backyard are a national security threat.
One report obtained by Deeper States and generated by the Wisconsin State Wide Intelligence Center shows intelligence components surveilling organizers of Deflock “days of action” in Alaska and Wisconsin.
The same Florida fusion center also warned about dangerously patriotic language surrounding an anti-flock day of action, with activists writing online that “The Fourth will be a day of independence not just for our country but from surveillance.” If advocating for a constitutional right to privacy is terrorism, a lot of people are about to be locked up.
Click the links below to read the full Fusion Center reports.
Below are some Fuck Flock Safety Signs to use….
How preposterous that Americans are labeled security threats (and sometimes "terrorists") for speaking out to oppose data centers and ridiculously intrusive surveillance systems. DHS is growing more and more fraudulent as an entity. It acts as a vehicle of intimidation on behalf of political and corporate/financial interests.
When you look at DHS salaries, there are long lists of employees paid over $200K per year. There are also thousands of highly-paid jobs for contractors. While people struggle to afford food, DHS is paying people nicely to participate in violating their fellow citizens and our Constitution. Unfortunately, those who accept these positions (and salaries) help to facilitate a violent, abusive totalitarian environment in the US.
I can't help but think of Eastern Europe under the Soviets. In 1991, I visited Slovakia while it was still run by Soviet-style communists (locally). The most well-paid people in town were party bootlickers. (As a side note....to be accurate about Slovakia, there were somewhat positive things under communism as well. There was little to no homelessness, for example. People had access to state run healthcare, to mixed reviews)
In the city where I stayed, the local communist party functionaries had higher salaries, homes with nice yards, swimming pools, nicer clothes, cars. Their kids participated in educational opportunities, had tennis lessons, etc. The rest of the residents in the city lived in little apartments in cement complexes or in crumbling old buildings in town. Families with multiple kids were crammed into apartments with room for maybe two people. The well-paid party bootlickers oversaw the (more analog) social surveillance system. It banned certain books and music and restricted political speech to non-existence. What you could study was controlled. You could be blacklisted for listening to folk singers who criticized the government or reading banned books. Those well-paid sycophants profited from destroying the culture of their own country and restricting opportunities for their own people.
This reminds me of DHS.