Is there a nationwide plan to confiscate all guns?

In the last month we have seen what can only be described as the largest attack on 2nd Amendment in the history of the United States.
 
Within hours of the horrific mass shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, elements of the corporate controlled media, in conjunction with a majority of politicians in a position of power, launched an all out propaganda blitz to convince the American people to accept not only a severely limited 2nd Amendment, but possibly a total gun ban.


Whether it be by Senator Dianne Feinstein, billionaire eugenicist Michael Bloomberg orPresident Obama himself, calls for and plans to limit private firearm ownership in America have been outlined and, in some cases, already put into law.
During the propaganda blitz that has accompanied President Obama’s task force and subsequent executive orders, each and every proponent of stricter gun control has claimed that they support the 2nd Amendment and do not want any sort of all out ban or confiscation.

Sadly, this couldn’t be further from the truth.

Despite public claims from Obama and the corporate media that anyone who says the government is coming for their guns is nothing more than a right wing conspiracy theorist, the reality of the situation is that many different politicians and proponents of gun control have openly revealed their actual intentions for gun confiscation.

Multiple different statements that have either been made recently or surfaced and gone viral in the past month paint a clear picture as to what the powers that be actually want and are possibly planning to do.

On top of that, a bill introduced into the House of Representatives also pushes citizens to voluntarily turn in their guns in yet another move towards confiscation. Remember, the government doesn’t have to go door to door confiscating firearms, they can easily use a series of laws that when combined would essentially equal confiscation for millions of Americans. (Although many will never turn them in.

A little over a week after the Sandy Hook Shooting, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told an Albany radio show that gun confiscation is an option being considered.

“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

Although this open call for illegal gun confiscation was downplayed after it was reported that the state might not even be able to pay for it, the fact remains that this admission by Cuomo shows that all out gun confiscation is his eventual goal.

More recently, New York actually did pass what can be considered the most draconian gun law in the country.

Yesterday, the New York State Senate passed a law prohibiting assault rifles and limiting magazines to 7 rounds. The law will go in front of the State Assembly today, where it is expected to pass easily.
Notably, the bill contains no grandfather clause for people who already own these weapons.

Now, in the wake of the passing of the above noted bill, a video of New York State Assemblyman Republican Steven F. McLaughlin revealing the startling fact that a version of the bill favored by Democrats did indeed contain a provision for outright gun confiscation has surfaced.

The short clip below is almost unbelievable. McLaughlin is basically told to shut his mouth, he then states that alright, he will not go there and then proceeds to smile while saying that yes gun confiscation would indeed damper a compromise.

Former New York City Mayor Ed Koch recently revealed his belief that all guns should be banned throughout the country.

“I belief for example that when Washington DC passed a law that nobody could have a gun except law enforcement and it was strict down by the United States Supreme Court that we should overrule the United States Supreme Court with a Constitutional Amendment.

I don’t belief in our society we should have guns.”

  
In yet another end around gun confiscation type move since the Sandy Hook Shootings, Rep. Rosa DeLauro introduced H.R. 226 to the House of Representatives on January 13.

The bill, full of startlingly direct wording, would give Americans a tax credit if they “surrender” their weapons.

H. R. 226
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against tax for surrendering to authorities certain assault weapons.

(a) Allowance of Credit.–
“(1) In general.–In the case of an individual who surrenders a specified assault weapon to the United States or a State or local government (or political subdivision thereof) as part of a Federal, State, or local public safety program to reduce the number of privately owned weapons, on the election of the taxpayer there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter an amount equal to $2,000.

The timing of the bill perfectly coincides with the corporate medias all out push to convince the American people that the only way to do their part in honoring the dead children is to support gun control and really do just about anything the authorities tell them is necessary to protect the children.

http://lewrockwell.com/orig14/thomas-alex1.1.1.html  

(VIDEO) James Taylor: ‘We need to make some sacrifices to our freedoms.’

Washington, DC - Addressing the issue of gun control, singer-songwriter James Taylor told The Daily Caller(TheDC) that Americans “need to make some sacrifices to our freedoms” in order to keep children safe.

Following his performance at President Obama’s second inauguration, TheDC asked Taylor if he agreed with Obama’s executive actions on gun control.

“I think the nation is very divided on gun control,” Taylor told TheDC, “but I think the majority of us feel strongly — even the majority of gun owners feel strongly — that we need to make some sacrifices to our freedoms, if that’s the way to put it. We need to make some sacrifices to what we might want to have, in order to safeguard our children.”

“I think there’s a limit to how much — I think the founding fathers wanted us to be able to arm ourselves, but I don’t think that they would have agreed that we should have the capacity to do the damage that we do have. And we just can’t afford it.”

Taylor told TheDC that he supports the president and sees him as a strong leader.
“I love this president for so many reasons,” he said. “I think he’s a true public servant. An amazingly capable and compassionate and intelligent man and a very level-headed citizen.”

“I just think we need more like him — not that there’s anyone else like him — but I think it’s great that we have him in government. We are very fortunate to have Barack Obama as our leader.”
TheDC also asked Taylor if he agreed with President Obama’s decision to extend many of former President George W. Bush’s policies, including the War in Afghanistan, keeping the Guantanamo Bay prison open and re-authorizing the Patriot Act.

“I wouldn’t second-guess the president, or pretend for a second that I know better than he does,” Taylor said. “He has the information and I trust him to make those important decisions for us. That’s what it means to have faith in a leader.”
http://nation.foxnews.com/james-taylor/2013/01/22/james-taylor-we-need-make-some-sacrifices-our-freedoms